Last Episode recap
- In the last episode we discussed Jenkins. We talked about what it is, what it is not and how it can be configured to use in your automation efforts.
Summary of this episode
- I hope you have seen that I’m trying to do these episodes in what I think is a very specific order. We will build on each episode so that you understand how each topic discussed can be used to enhance your automation effort.
- In this episode, we will discuss maintaining a software “chain of custody”, why it is important, what happens if you don’t and how your automation can help you do it.
What’s in it for you
- A better understanding of the importance of maintaining good software controls and how it keeps you and your company out of trouble.
- Why does it matter?
- In 2001, a large corporation named Enron was embroiled in a controversy involving its financial records. It was followed by other controversies with other large publicly traded corporations.
- In July of 2002, two U.S. Congressmen, Sen. Paul S. Sarbanes and Sen. Michael G. Oxley, sponsored a bill to rein in the fraudulent financial reporting that led to these massive corruption scandals. This bill was titled the Sarbanes-Oxley Corporate Responsibility Act of 2002 (or SOX for short).
- The bill tightened controls around how a company recorded and reported its financial Information.
- One of its goals was to provide for structured, consistent and repeatable controls.
- It was created as a way to for the leaders and employees of a company to create and maintain a culture of corporate financial responsibility.
- It provided for the officers of a company to “sign” their financial statements. This means that they take personal responsibility that they are accurate and correct with no malfeasance or attempts at fraud against investors.
- It increased the fines and sentences for individuals that attempt to commit fraud or illegal financial practices.
- It requires a company to document its internal control processes.
- It requires a company to to have an external auditor to certify that their internal control processes are being followed and that the financials are accurate.
- It dictates that all off-balance sheet transactions must be reported.
- It provides the Security and Exchange Commission more power to perform investigate any company suspected of violations.
- Who has to comply?
- All publicly traded companies
- All subsidiaries of foreign companies in the U.S.
- All private companies that are preparing for an IPO
- Fines and Prison Time
- Non-compliance could result in fines up to $1 million dollars and up to 10 years in jail
- If a company intentionally defrauds investors, it could result in $5 million dollars in fines and up to 20 years in jail.
- When should you worry about it?
- You shouldn’t worry about it too much but,
- You should make sure that your control processes are well documented, your staff understands why they are in place, and any consequences that they or the company might face if they do not follow the controls.
- Where should they be implemented in your SDLC?
- In my opinion, every step of the SDLC, for example:
- Requirements – should be documented and changes should be tracked.
- Development – All source code should be in an SCM system so that any changes can be tracked back to why and who made the change.
- Build – All builds should be documented and all artifacts of the build process should be stored and versioned.
- Testing – all test cases that are used to verify requirement functionality should be documented and any results of those test cases related to a specific build should be tagged with the build ID and archived after completion.
- Environments – All changes to an environment used for a specific build should be tagged and documented for approval prior to implementation.
- Deploy – The reason for the deployment, date and time, and approval should all be documented.
- Promotion to a higher environment – all approvals should be documented and tracked for each environment promotion.
- In my opinion, every step of the SDLC, for example:
- How can your automation help you with all this documentation?
- By using some or all of the tools that we are discussing, you can have a lot of this documentation done for you automatically by your automation.
- For Example:
- Requirements: Jira, Quality Center
- Development: Github, Bitbucket, SVN, Team Foundation Server
- Build: Maven, Gradle, Jenkins, CI/CD pipelines
- Testing: qTest, Quality Center, Bugzilla
- Environments: CI/CD, Jira
- Deploy: CI/CD, Jenkins, Ansible, Terraform
- Promotion: Jira, Remedy, ServiceNow
- Each of these tools will automatically record the changes that you make, builds that run, tests that are performed, and artifacts that are deployed.
- Using Jenkins or a similar tool, you can create a pipeline or job that can automatically create the files required by your audit partners to run their reviews.
- Usually the only changes to be reviewed after automation are any changes that are made to the automation pipeline/jobs themselves.
- Working with internal and external auditors can be a daunting task since they are trained to ask many probing questions to identify problems with your process.
- Using automation makes their and your job easier when it is time to perform these control reviews, which is usually monthly, quarterly, semi-annually or annually.
recap of this episode
- In this episode we discussed what software chain of custody is, why it is important, where it originated, how it is controlled, and how your automation can assist you in financial reporting compliance audits.
Next Episode: Artifact repositories